Safe Sex With Jesus
Safe Sex With Jesus
Although Christianity presents Jesus as Savior, it’s hard pressed to explain. The Roman Empire occupying Jewish Palestine, during the period when Jesus was teaching, would have explained that a dead Jesus was a safe Jesus, because he was perceived as a ‘dissident’ in a time of civil unrest. Taking Jesus to the hill of Calvary outside the city of Jerusalem to where he was nailed to a cross and died, the Romans were making Christianity ‘safe’ for the Roman Catholic church that would come after the Jewish ‘Christ’, that is, the Messiah, whose teaching would later be promulgated by Jesus’ disciple, Peter, first head of the Christian church in Rome, whose successors would also be called ‘Pope’, ‘Love your neighbor as you love yourself.’ (Mk: 12. 31) Born of his mother, the Virgin Mary, Jesus experienced Resurrection and Ascension to heaven, because futanarian women were able to sexually reproduce a species of women independently of men. Born independently of male semen, Jesus was ‘woman’s seed`. Consequently, his Resurrection and Ascension to heaven above the Earth prefigured women’s colonization of the planets amongst the stars in escape from parasitical host womb slavery to the Empire of men’s wars. In short, Jesus was ‘Savior’ because he symbolized the human species of ‘woman’s seed` escape from men’s slaving of her host womb for war.
Christianity has presented Jesus as ‘safe’, because he was ostensibly celibate, and killed, which agreed with later Christian perceptions that sexual abstention was good. Moreover, the figure of a sexually neutered ‘Messiah’ could be used to present sex per se as evil. However, because women are a single human futanarian species of ‘woman’s seed`, they’re essentially a single unmarrying race. As an unadulterated race, men are their adulterate, that is, Jesus was killed to prevent the realization that sex was presented as evil by men to prevent ‘woman’s seed` from realizing that her species was adulterated, although she couldn’t be accused of adultery. In other words, for women’s species, adultery doesn’t exist, so there isn’t any need for taboo about sex based on Christian morality, that is, sex encourages adultery, which is evil. To put it another way, Christian prohibitions against representations of sexuality encouraging adultery presuppose that men are ‘animal husbandry’. Or, in other words, women are a captured race farmed by an alien slaver for war against her own womb’s product, that is, civilization, culture and art.
In 1983 DR Congo discovered the human immune deficiency virus (HIV), which developed into acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). The ‘incurable killer disease’ spread from apes to humans through a mutated variant of simian immune deficiency virus (SIV1), and was transmitted by homosexual men’s mixing blood, shit and semen in each other’s anus in sterile mockery of women’s mode of sexual reproduction, that is, AIDS constituted a ‘biological weapon’ aimed by men at the human race on behalf of its alien enslaver. As Christian morality presented Jesus as ‘safe’, because castrated, the Jewish ‘Christ’, that is, Messiah, was a symbol of effective birth control. As condoms were taboo to the Catholic church, Jesus represented ‘safe sex’ through abstention, that is, castration. In simple terms, the Christian church advocated that the human futanarian species of ‘woman’s seed` be castrated through reference to Jesus’ celibacy, which is in direct opposition to God’s plan as described in the Old Testament of the Bible, that is, the Torah and Talmud, which is the history and law of the Jews: ‘If only you had paid attention to my commands, your peace would have been like a river, your well-being like the waves of the sea. Your descendants would have been like the sand, your children like its numberless grains; their name would never be blotted out nor destroyed from before me.’ (Is: 48. 19-20)
In ancient Greece, homosexuality in pederasty was institutionalized for the host womb enslavement of the human futanarian species of ‘woman’s seed` for war. Consequently, the HIV/AIDS virus was a further indication that ‘biological warfare’ was what men were for. By the early 21st century modern Greeks, that is, technophile ‘geeks’, had devised ‘bad machine code’ virus to infect every computer brain on the planet Earth, with the aim of destroying hope in its future, while the brainpower ‘woman’s seed` needed had been denied her by making her futanarian species’ sex taboo. In short, men were homosexual because they didn’t want the woman to have a penis: `Men cursed the God of heaven for their pains and their sores, but refused to repent of what they had done.’ (Rev: 16. 11) Jesus’ disciple, John, in his New Testament of the Bible apocalyptic Revelation of the future, suggested that men preferred homosexuality’s wars in pederasty and HIV/AIDS to ‘woman’s seed’, which was why God had prepared that punishment of eternal unendurable pain, which is perdition for the evil.
From a Christian perspective, it’s important that the children are safe from Jesus, who was killed as a celibate representative of ‘woman’s seed`. The pederasts and/or pedophiles didn’t want women to have sole care of humanity’s offspring, because that wouldn’t give the warmongers an opportunity to ‘play soldiers’, so humans were identified as holy if celibate. As history shows, people have interpreted this as meaning that they could torture to death any unmarried individual, for example, after denouncing her as a ‘witch’,1 so that the children would be safe. Of course, as women were a single unadulterated species if unmarried, that is, not morally evil because sexual, torturing Jesus’ unmarried ‘seed’ to death, because then the children would be safe, was a widely accepted, though socio-pathological, evil.
Censorship of the mass media has contributed to the acceptance of evil, for example, almost all of literature is devoid of representations of reproductive sex between women. In science fiction, which is meant to be the literary genre that tests the boundaries of society through imagination, taboos against realistic depictions of sexual intercourse are almost never tested. US’ science fiction writer, Robert A. Heinlein (1907-88), perhaps the best exponent of the genre’s capacity for exploring social parameters, wrote his seminal critique of Christianity, Stranger In A Strange Land (1961), expressing a belief in sexual permissiveness through his ‘Messiah’, Valentine Michael Smith who, born on Mars and raised by Martians, after a spaceship crashed there, returns to Earth to comprehend, or ‘grok’ as the Martians say, the beauty of human sexuality, without the author, Heinlein, being able to describe it.
As Jesus was crucified, Michael is similarly killed for preaching ‘Agape’, that is, universal love, which of course includes physical love: ``Lynch him! Give the bastard a nigger necktie!` A heavy-gauge shotgun blasted at close range and Mike's right arm was struck off at the elbow and fell. It floated gently down, then came to rest on the cool grasses, its hand curved open in invitation.`2 Mike is murdered for his inability to see that people are evil: `Through bruised and bleeding lips he smiled at them, looking straight into the camera with an expression of yearning tenderness on his face. Some trick of sunlight and stereo formed a golden halo back of his head. `Oh my brothers, I love you so! Drink deep. Share and grow closer without end. Thou art God.’ The mob’s antipathy to Mike’s message of Agape is symptomatic of Christian perceptions about adultery, that is, women are evil because they encourage it, whereas sexual reproduction between women is what women’s futanarian species of ‘woman’s seed’ is for, while men are what adulterates her single race, which doesn’t wed, and so she can’t be accused of being an adulteress. Consequently, the moral perception that women are evil, because they encourage adultery, is reverse racism, that is, men are evil because they seek to adulterate a species which isn’t theirs. However, without breaking taboos against realistic depictions of human sexuality in science fiction, it isn’t possible to explain that women aren’t evil, that is, the taboo exists so that men can write that they are.
The argument put forward by the pederasts and/or the pedophiles is that children must be protected. However, as homosexuality in pederasty for war against ‘woman’s seed’ on behalf of the alien enslaver of the species of women’s host womb shows, money diverted into munitions, rather than medical science to cure a virus like AIDS, for example, means that the aged die, whereas they could have eternal youth, that is, the homosexuals, pederasts and/or pedophiles want children to play soldiers with, and are prepared to extinguish the human race ‘live on TV’, so that they can have more children to play with. In fact, men and women have been manufactured as a single male brained creature wearing each other’s clothes in ‘TV’ transvestism for ‘TV war’, so that the ‘plague’ gamers can ignore their disappearing into extinction on the smaller screens of ‘phones without earpieces: ‘… war without tears.’2
1 Radford, Benjamin, ‘Indian Woman Beaten to Death for 'Witchcraft'’, LiveScience, July 31, 2014, 12: 54 pm ET, https://www.livescience.com/47129-nepalese-woman-killed-for-witchcraft.html .
2 Gabriel, Peter ‘Games Without Frontiers’, Peter Gabriel, Charisma, 1980.